Category Archives: Uncategorized

FOX PERSONALITIES: NAZIS ARISE

Posted on by

0

Use Joseph Goebbels’ playbook to promote the master race: Kill Jews, Blacks, Asians, Slavs, and everyone else until Teutonic people can populate the Earth.

Today Fox promotes white replacement conspiracy theory complaining that non-white immigrants are diminishing white culture. Fox News uses a lot of buzz words. So what is white culture?

MUSIC. Go into the nineteenth century and Louis Moreau Gottschalk’s music pleased Frederick Chopin in Paris. That Louisiana gentleman incorporated slave rhythms into his music. Edward McDowell tried to conform his music to white European standards, but went nuts. Anton Dvorak hired a black singer to sing spirituals. Dvorak wrote the Second Movement of the New World Symphony (number 9) which is spiritual sounding. Scott Joplin preceded Alexander’s Ragtime Band. George Gershwin’s music was so compelling, distinctive and popular that Maurice Ravel refused to give him composition lessons, acclaiming, “You’re George Gershwin!” The last movement of Rachmaninoff’s Fourth Piano Concerto (with the composer performing) sounds like Duke Ellington. Leonard Bernstein incorporated rhythms and themes of black folk into his music

In the popular area beginning with World War One jazz, blues and swing and all it derivatives were adopted by white composers and performers through World War Two. The King, Elvis Presley, knew of Black influences well: You ain’t nuthin’ but a hound dog…” was a song with the same words and notes long sung in Southern African-American communities. The Beatles have credited black music with laying the foundation for their music. Finally, The Grand Old Opry relented to the inevitable long influences affecting music performed there.

During the early 1950’s and into the early 1960’s White Supremacists complained about Black musical influences affecting white youth. They complained but could get no support to ban rock and blues concerts in the transient music scene. On the weekly charts Americans can read of music sales, streaming and downloads. Did the White Supremacists offer to replace music with anything – The Ride of the Valkyries by a true Kraut, Richard Wagner. Valkyries are a type of female handmaiden, fairies riding in the upper airs. That’s fitting for white culture. Or perhaps enthusiasts of white culture like the dreary, prosaic, dull jazz performed in Moscow performed by Slavs. The Russians have no idea what the blues, jazz and syncopated rhythms are.

It is difficult to identify which white person contributed any advancement to music meeting the standards of White America. The threads of music today are so fractious, it is difficult to determine beyond the idea that the predominate themes and rhythms is non-white. But I’m sorry, I have left out the white activity of square dancing although there seemed to be no square dancers in the crowd in Washington D.C. on January 6, 2021. It is also likely there were no fans of Montevani or Lawrence Welk, who is syndicated for the purpose of providing thirst for sacred white notes.

LITERATURE is any old book. Mark Twain said about Henry James’ books, writing much about trivialities of rich white folk, “Once you put one of James’ books down, you can’t pick it up.” Old Liz Wharton, nee Jones, had the same flaw of writing about rich white folk. Liz Jones’ family prided itself on having the newest innovations in their house – electricity and telephone – prompting neighbors to say, “keeping up with the Joneses.”

Literature has gone nowhere in America. Most Americans like comic books and graphic novels, pictures help tell what the words mean. Those sorts of stories are reality to some Americans, yet on January 6, 2021 I saw no super heroes invading the Capitol: No one was hanging from the rafters and gliding to the floor; no one jumped and stuck against a wall; everyone walked – no one zoomed out evading the eyes and ears of law enforcement. No one carried The Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin, the book Davy Crockett took with him to the Alamo.

ART. It is what you make of it, if you can tell what it is. Persons at the forefront of modern, contemporary, and temporary art are mostly white. They are the people the Nazis singled out, collecting those paintings, drawings, sculptures and burned them. From the supply left in stock the Nazis were lazy and ignorant. Indeed, I have a finger painting from kindergarten which I considered good. No one has offered me $5,000 for it, a one and only, so I took it off the market. For persons wanting to buy this youthful art, send $50,000 to —

It is difficult to understand Nazi sculpture, big, bulky, burley, muscular men. Men lift weights to increase bicep size to compensate for shortcomings. Nazis were afraid of Jewish men; they had no biceps. Leni Riefenstahl (a middle name is Bertha) spent much time filming African bodies. The Krauts are so obvious in their fallibilities. Their army, and Adopt himself, were speed freaks, meth addicts and crystal nuts. Goering was a heroin addict. Good white culture means choose a drug of choice, alcohol, dugs and chemical concoctions made up on the spot, and consume.

SPORTS. Since the days of Joe Lewis, Jesse Owens, Jim Thorpe, Jackie Robinson and hundreds of Latinos Americans have invited athletes into their homes. Early on there were rough patches, but the road smoothed. Occasionally, there are potholes – traps for race. Imagine someone being blamed for an error in a baseball game. It’s not like that player blew the whole series like Bill Buckner. Yes, some players today miss dunks. Some receivers drop the ball when tossed in their hands. Others fumble the ball. Centers don’t hike the ball correctly. Players can’t make free- throws. Pitchers can’t get the ball close to the plate. Others have hitless-streaks. I don’t know what to say about Ice Hockey. Car racing. Black drivers and mechanics might be better. Remember McCoy of The Real McCoy was an Black American in the nineteenth century. Car racing enthusiasts have likely lost the battle to make those tracks the last foothold of white culture. Yet one sees sadness everyday for white people, who would rather watch car racing than drive correctly and efficiently on Los Angeles freeways.

GAMING. This area of culture appears to be mostly white and Asian-American. The games are completely void of human beings which is what the Fox Oriented White Culture wants. Nothing

on Fox is human. Everything is a talking point, words put together, but development of no ideas or concepts. Fox likes cliches, which mean little or are misconstrued.

Some cliche-oriented authors, like Leon Trotsky, can write well. I began one of his books, and when he wasn’t talking about revolution and social issues, every other paragraph, he actually described events and social settings perfectly: Before World War One relations among persons in the European nobility was cosmopolitan adultery. I stopped reading when the paragraph structures broke down. Trotsky began dropping in revolutionary Marxist catch-phrases and cliches every other sentence.

In gaming there is none of the linguistic complications to overcome or interpret. There are no rules except sudden elimination, sudden death, game over. Triumph! It must be pleasing to White Culture that games focus interest in killing opponents, whether they be bad guys, aliens, monsters, or any other culprit. There is no humanity. Bad guys don’t look like Moses or Jesus Christ. Moral to each game: Be a Neanderthal, shortly to become extinct, so don’t become a homo sapiens sapiens.

CULTURE. A modern definition of culture might be anything that engages or entertains a human being. More and more culture and cultural influence in America is determined by the amount of money one makes being cultural and cultivated. At the bottom of this influential pit of music, literature, art, sports and gaming are loads of White people. They have no right to complain. They freely participate and engage in all aspects of culture. And they accept whole heartedly the bottomline, best said by Wilt Chamberlain, The only color that makes any difference in the United States is green.

It is odd that Fox does not appreciate the diminishment of white culture over centuries. Theirs is a business attitude that money can cure and make anything. Give someone a voice and see how far he goes. Fox is attempting to do that with Tucker Carlson, who talks but obviously is not intelligent. He’s mastered the cliches but will create none of his own. Tuck may become a cliche for failure. Fox is promoting him poorly. Fox does not identify anchors as news reporters. On Fox those persons have been devalued and demoted. They are called personalities. A town clown might be a personality, someone odd, off beat, doing something different because he can’t control himself or conform. Yet no harm is done and the clown mimics the town’s pleasure like the personalities, aka thugs, coming to town to gun down Gary Cooper in High Noon.

Personality-Tuck has aspirations without talent or a solid launching pad. A big achievement over the last year was elbowing aside Hannity. Tuck needs to spit and drool propaganda to the white masses obediently awaiting each word. The right wing needs a replacement. Rush Limbaugh, super jock, is dead and who’s going to spoon out his words? The only advice I’ll give: Right off, Tuck should drop Tucker, and perhaps Tuck. It is best to chose a name without u-c-k in it. A person with those letters is too easy to ridicule, or mistake. On a bad day Tuck might be included in the world’s shortest book: Nazi Nice Guys.

If one thing is to be observed about Tuck, he looks the sort that has never read a book. He should start with None Dare Call It Treason. Ronald Reagan read it. That might take Tuck away from cliches and catch-phrases. However, Tuck has a long way to go before he can determine what and which white culture is being threatened in today’s world. White people have to learn to conceive ideas and define concepts and develop the same.White people cannot whine and cry and lament they have no voice if they produce nothing vital and interesting for fellow Americans: NO originality, NO white culture. Violence does not interest Americans. Loads of white people oppose those means to dictate what Americans should think, see, hear and enjoy.

A Life of Sorts

Posted on by

0

Graham Greene

This autobiography of Graham Greene recounting his years of failure – youth, schooling, university, employment and writing novels unsuccessfully, drifts. It might be the drifting without the young author showing much zeal tells that life intentionally – slacker does good without knowing how it happened. However, the writing is mediocre. Good writers must be masters of the language to write poorly. Graham Greene does not have those abilities.

It is supremely odd that while growing up Greene does not mention knowing or reading John Buchan.

Passages where writing is discussed are lazy. Either a writer believes in 1,2 and 3, or a, b or c, or I, II or III, or Mercury, Venus and Earth. Rules and advice are clear using snappy words. The reader and any writer looking for advice from Graham should be cautious: “The smell of opium is more agreeable than the smell of success.”

Other than drugs and Russian Roulette, Greene is the type of writer who does not use the imagination – he must experience something first hand to tell of it – although someone coming from a drug stupor and trying to write about it frequently fails to say much.

NEANDERTHALS

Posted on by

0

“Neanderthals are hunter-gathers. They are protectors of their family (sic) They are resilient. They are resourceful. They tend to their own.” Marsha Blackburn, United States Senator, Tennessee.

Neanderthals are extinct. That fact shows their total inability to be resilient, resourceful, and to tend to their own. So much for that evolutionary success story.

Senator Marsha Blackburn is of the ilk to be a Southern Belle, but nothing in her life suggests she has ever liked or known Neanderthals. Her husband is not. If her daughter is dating a Neanderthal, she would tell the Senator. Is the Senator’s son a Neanderthal? That judgment is better made by women his own age.

Which Neanderthal attributes does Marsha prize? Neanderthals beheld the sun as a God, and the moon has his wife. Being unsanitary was part of their lives – they left their garbage in caves where they presumably slept. Did Neanderthals use the same cave space as potties? Were Neanderthals careful where their off-spring played? Did a pandemic finally wipe Neanderthals from the face of the Earth? Did the Neanderthals ever wear face masks? Did they eat food off rocks of strangers? Did they bathe often, or where they just hairy, stinky hulks of jockey height?

When Neanderthals were on the hunt, did each of them go to eating the kill, right off the carcass, rather than cook it? Did Neanderthals eat fowl when it had not been cooked to 165 degrees Fahrenheit? Did Neanderthals use soap and water and sing “Happy Birthday” twice when washing their paws? Did Neanderthal’s spit or regurgitate stuff during dinners with their families?

Are all the Senator’s constituents homo sapiens sapiens? Is Curt Shilling the sort of Neanderthal the Senator likes? Has the Senator learned over the years that constituents have retroluted on the genetic track, and they are truly Neanderthals? Depending upon the number of affirmative answers from the Senator, it may be time to quarantine Tennessee from the remainder of America to protect homo sapiens sapiens from the Neanderthal crowd.

PUT YOUR BODIES UPON THE WHEELS

Posted on by

0

KENNETH HEINEMAN (226 PAGES)

Some arguments and assessments in this history of the Sixties are off, but this book is short and invaluable; it describes many people prominent during the Sixties: Have a name, and likely there is a short reference in the index. The shortcomings of the book is a lack of footnotes and a truly functional bibliography.

What was written about West Coast events is largely in error. There are arrests and generally the dates are accurate, but what happened is wrong. The easiest of such issues happened at San Francisco State, escalating riots about minority studies. Administrators were frozen. S.I. Hayakawa, set up a mass arrest in late 1968 and let it be known he – Hayakawa – was ready to talk. He talked with each minority and hammered out solutions. The only group Hayakawa would not negotiate with were whites. Hayakawa had the blessing and backing of Governor Ronald Reagan. Hayakawa did not cave into leftist demands as Heineman says. Hayakawa’s success was felt across San Francisco Bay in Berkeley, where University Administrators were wondering, What is Hayakawa’s secret?

In its organization the book suggests much more organization the leadership of the Left had over events and happenings. Thee are names and in some places, those names may have had great sway over events, which had repercussions elsewhere. Kent State was a multiplier. But many of those issues were national in origin, not local which also could give rise to protests and violence.

Primarily, the names who wrote were not read. No one wanted to slog through Marxist-Stalinist- Maoist tripe. Whereas writers in the feminist, the ecological and in the disability movement were read. They discussed issues pertinent and common sensical to the American future, for young and old. Women, ecology and disability arose during the last Sixties but are little mentioned in this book.

Heineman does not otherwise sugar coat much when describing youth and their times: I did not know to get James Meredith’s admission into the University of Mississippi (October 1962), the Kennedy’s assigned U.S. Marshalls to protect him; they could not use their weapons. In a riot 166 Marshalls were injured including 28 gunshot wounds. 1962, was the first violent campus riot of the Sixties. It was also buried by the Cuban Missile Crisis beginning two weeks later.

I never liked George Wallace, but I did not know he rallied hecklers at his political rallies: Wallace said they liked four letter words, and offered two of his own: Soap. Work.

Needless to say Old Miss rioters and shooters were not the ideological companions of rioters and protesters elsewhere, except for the hate, loathing and disregard for law and civil order. Issues of these leaders and rioters are set forth in this book, briefly and intelligently.

In the final sum-up Heineman short-shrifts the counter-culture as causing long-lasting effects of those events and forces. The primary manifestations are drug usage and loud music. And today many Boomers are hard of hearing, are reliant on pharmaceuticals (One pills makes you bigger, and the other makes you small) and they think little. Obscurantism is an American problem.

It should be observed that many of the incidences directed at the Fifties and Sixties Civil Rights Movements and at its leaders are present today.

WHITHER FEDERALISM?

Posted on by

0

Reading around the Internet and happening upon Real Clear Politics, History, was Taking Federalism Seriously “explaining the major themes that define the American mind.”

This article is Bogus and Bull. The articles relies on Alexis Tocqueville who toured the United States in the early 1830s and wrote a book, Democracy in America. Old Alexis was here 30 years before the American Civil War and 35 years before Amendments 13, 14, 15 were added to the American Constitution. On an institutional level Tocqueville knew American democracy and government, not. His book may be of sociological interest.

Amendments, 13, 14 and 15, changed federalism as Tocqueville or anyone observing earlier knew it. Anytime an amendment has a paragraph, usually at the end, providing, The Congress shall have the power to enforce by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article, federalism is weakened or eliminated and a grant of authority and power is given to the Federal government.

Real Clear Politics should stop deceiving itself and its readers.

CENTURY OF STRUGGLE

Posted on by

0

Eleanor Flexner and Ellen Fitzpatrick

RECOMMENDED

This excellent history also serves as a text book on women’s movements from 1800 to 1920. Various women appear depending upon their achievements and strides in given fields: education, professions, doing social work and efforts in politics.

Women knew of their time, society and opponents. In many ways in the early Twentieth Century suffrage became a white woman’s movement because joining with African American women would distract from immediate goals. Readers should infer that race was always boiling, and misdirected efforts for a long time were employed to keep a lid on that issue. Yet, efforts and activities of African-American women were duly noted through out the text. One drawback there was little or no women’s movement in the ante-bellum south. Indeed, African American women were usually the persons making any effort.

At the beginning of the Twentieth Century a woman in middle age returned to America and found leadership of the women’s movement stale. Idioms, concepts and imagination came from days of yore, using the older language. She joined the leadership and things changed. Yet, a women in her later fifties a decade later did not want to be the lead in specifics surrounding suffrage. Youth was necessary to use its energy and do the work. [A sudden shift: Many delegates going most of the work of the 1787 Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, like Madison, were in their thirties and early forties. Older men were respected and considered elders.] Century of Struggle makes that notation in passing. It’s a youth movement. Most of the country wanted suffrage – expect opposing interests: liquor, bars, manufacturing and Americans whose principles of democracy were rotten to the core.

It should be observed in the 1960s and early 1970s African American women had to choose between Civil Rights and the then current Women’s Movement. On the Left women had to chose between supporting male leftists in their communities and their own interests as women and as human beings. Part of that divergence of their stories is reflected in literature of African-American women of the 1970s.

THE NEW EMPIRE

Posted on by

0

Walter Lefeber

RECOMMENDED

Written 60 years ago, this book is remarkably prescient. The story of American business, government and policy from 1860 to 1898 begins with the policy makers, non-government or one-time government employees writing to advise the United States government how to conduct foreign affairs to make the most of business opportunities.

STOP! At one time America had competent diplomats amongst its politicians. Benjamin Franklin in Paris was the best. John Adams was not bad, but certainly not as good as his son, John Quincy Adams.

One hundred years after relying on experts or shills e.g. the old wise men who decided and advised fighting in Vietnam, the policies of experts has not changed. Wilson had his Colonel House and indecision. FDR had inexperienced wise guys making horrendous decisions before and during World War II, etc., etc., etc.. The Reagan administration took advice from Adam Ulam, preeminent Harvard Professor (Soviet expert) who did not want to be on-top. Ulam wanted to be on-tap, giving advise when asked but the responsibility of decision making was on the politicians.

The New Empire ably marches readers through 25 years of American business and diplomatic history – Hawaii, the Caribbean, Central and South America, and eastern Asia. Many one-time hot-spots have sensible historical passages devoted to them; sources are fact and resource-rich e.g. American policy on a canal in Nicaragua and Panama.

Professor LaFeber tells the history straight, not editorializing much about outcomes from adverse, poor or hurried decisions.

BROTOPIA

Posted on by

0

EMILY CHANG


This lengthy piece of journalism chronicles deeds and misdeeds against women in administration, electrical engineering, software programmers, games and venture capitalism, all in Silicon Valley. When each set of acts occurred is not always in the text. The book lacks an index and a bibliography.
A value of the text is in ANTITRUST analyses. Author-Chang outlines the market and some forces affecting technology. An obvious “barrier to entry” is the adolescent male manias discouraging technology, innovation and competition. Most persons and businesses in the first paragraph hold and promote after hours sex gatherings – cuddle puddles – compelled sex because women have to join (not be a voyeur) or be absent. Women were degraded or dismissed whether they were involved (easy reputation) or not present (not one of the boys).
Little incidents can trigger antitrust analyses. Women were not excluded because they had abilities but because they had standards and scruples. This party coercion and settings approach criminality. Indeed, before there were Antitrust Laws in the nineteenth century, competitors frequently committed crimes against each other to gain advantage and to suppress businesses of competitors. Silicon Valley seems no different.
Brotopia becomes much more interesting when reading takes the subject beyond specific incidents into a comprehensive understanding of the greater picture.

BOTTLE SHOCK

Posted on by

0

Alan Rickman, Chris Pine, Bill Pullman, Rachael Taylor Every performance is excellent.

I had no idea whether this story is true – Chateau Montelena was about to go under at the time it won first prize for its Chardonnay at the Judgment of Paris, 1976. The truth may have made a better story, but for the film these facts fit well.

The scenery (miles of vineyards) is authentic. Having bought, drank, aged in storage, and sold wine, the movie is a delight to see as much activity, enthusiasm and dedication to growing, crushing, aging, bottling and selling wine. Wine perfection is a slow process. This movie does not show all that time. The tasting in Paris took wine near the end of the aging stage into bottles, and tested one wine against another.

One point should not be overlooked, which the movie shows. Many French wines fit the delicacy and exquisiteness of France’s culinary output. The movie shows Americans make wine that go with hamburgers, fried chicken and guacamole.

SMALL TOWN SATURDAY NIGHT

Posted on by

0

Chris Pine, Bre Blair

This is a terrific film about showing the unhappy steps needed to choose the pursuit of happiness. In a small-town crooner and song writer (Pine) wants to go to Nashville for happiness and prosperity. He has lived in the small place, Prospect, his entire life and has ties there, including a thriving romance with Blair. Pine will take Blair and her child with him.

She gets last-minute cold feet, wondering if leaving is the best move. Ex is a deputy sheriff, who is Pine’s subordinate in the Sheriff’s Department.

The writing and scenes describes many small town lives in a cadre of characters, glimpses of incidences, days all the same in a known environment, hours seem repeated and familiar, every day feels the same for each person. Residents know and appreciate that anyone with talent must leave e.g. the meeting between Pine and the Ex in the final scene: Take care of Bre and the kid. Put the town on the map.

A lot of is going on in the 36 hours that the film presents. There’s no big scene between Pine and Bre. Throughout that day something happens and Pine asks, What am I doing here? Every situation she experiences reinforces her decision to say.

Pine doesn’t sing much, except a song near the end. He doesn’t convincingly venture and guess and put together words and concepts when he is alone, at home, in the car, at work. He says he has a melody in his head, but viewers never hear it. This artistic input obviously was not in the script. A story point is missing: How does an artist in a familiar environment originate while being bombarded with impediments of the known and mundane.